Saturday, March 27, 2010

Saul, King of Manipulation

32 And David said to Saul, "Let no man's heart fail because of him. Your servant will go and fight with this Philistine."
33
And Saul said to David, "You are not able to go against this Philistine to fight with him, for you are but a youth, and he has been a man of war from his youth."
34
But David said to Saul, "Your servant used to keep sheep for his father. And when there came a lion, or a bear, and took a lamb from the flock,
35
I went after him and struck him and delivered it out of his mouth. And if he arose against me, I caught him by his beard and struck him and killed him.
36
Your servant has struck down both lions and bears, and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be like one of them, for he has defied the armies of the living God."
37
And David said, "The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said to David, "Go, and the Lord be with you!"
38
Then Saul clothed David with his armor. He put a helmet of bronze on his head and clothed him with a coat of mail,
39
and David strapped his sword over his armor. And he tried in vain to go, for he had not tested them. Then David said to Saul, "I cannot go with these, for I have not tested them." So David put them off.

1 Sam 17:32-39 (ESV)

When most preachers and teachers cover these verses, the focus is on David: his faith, his courage, and his wisdom. I want to briefly focus on Saul, King of Israel, King of Good Intentions, or is he simply the King of Manipulation? Did he have David's best interest at heart in offering David his battle armor? Did David convince Saul he could defeat Goliath?

Personally, I believe the situation was a win-win situation for King Saul, at least in his mind. Dressing David in his armor could accomplish three things. First, if David died in battle, Saul could deny sending him into battle. Second, if David one in battle and remained in full armor, some might think the king defeated Goliath, surely everyone knew his armor. Finally, if David won and was revealed to be David, he sent a champion out in a greater manner than other kings. He allowed his champion the best armor in the land, his.

In the previous chapter, we learned that David had become Saul's armor bearer. He had full access to the king's armor when he was present for service to the king. When David arrived, despite his brave speech, it is reasonable that he should reenter the service of the king. Therefore, it would be reasonable that should David die in battle to claim he took the armor unknown to the king. You can almost hear the speech, let us remember David, the impetuous youth, who with the best intentions took without permission the king's armor and sword, and died in valiant effort before Israel and Goliath. In this case, Saul would save face for sending a youth of no apparent skill against a seasoned warrior-giant.

Likewise, in the other two scenarios, Saul saves face. In one, he becomes the savior of Israel. In the last, he becomes the savior of Israel. "Thank you, Thank you, when no man stepped forward, I knew that I must take action, when the shepherd boy spoke, I knew I must take action. Normally, a king would not fight in one-on-one combat, but I knew I must take action. Today, the power of the Philistines broke. Tomorrow brings ultimate defeat for the Philistines!" Oh, the mighty speech Saul might have given. On the other hand, Perhaps this speech, "I knew the boy could win, I have spent many a day with this young man, heard his stories, trained him, and as my armor bearer made him strong, courageous, and ready for the challenge!"

However, God received the glory and the newly anointed future king began to grow in influence. Mark the moment of David's rise in the eyes of the people, the peak of his favor with Saul, and the beginning of a period of persecution, that prepared a shepherd for the throne.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

A Leadership Analysis from A Tale of Three Kings: A Study in Brokenness by Gene Edwards

Many people speak of natural leaders being born for the times of their identification, but history shows that leaders are not born as often as created. Even those who are natural born leaders possessing that certain something that causes others to follow are God created. However, not everyone who has ever led an organization, nation, team, or playground qualifies as a good leader. More importantly, for the Christian, not every good leader is a righteous leader capable of leading God's people. A Tale of Three Kings: A Study in Brokenness by Gene Edwards draws on the interaction of King Saul and David, and King David and King Absalom, the son of David who temporarily overthrew his father. This tale intends to ensure that good leaders learn how to become righteous leaders capable of leading the people of God. It is for this reason that each leader is examined against two factors: the greatest secular leadership model in the world, the United States (US) Army's be, know, do, and the manual that holds the answers for all leaders, the Bible. Each king's presentation for examination is in the order of his first or only reign.

King Saul

King Saul is the first king of Israel. Saul, chosen by God to be an instrument of chastisement for Israel's rejection of God's theocratic reign over the nation using judges, is the king of appearance. Samuel prophesied of his reign, in warning to the nation, prior to his selection for coronation. According to scripture, Saul begins his reign in humility, but soon rises in power to accomplish mighty deeds for himself. Saul teaches fledgling leaders what the world says a leader should be, what a leader should know, and what a leader does.

Be

Throughout part one of the narrative drama presented by Gene Edwards, King Saul is what a worldly leader should be. Saul, as known from scripture and as presented, is a powerful leader who on more than once occasion is among the prophets. Saul is a warrior capable of leading an army into battle. He stands taller than anyone does. Saul is the premier leader. Leaders are powerful and display their unbroken power. Saul is authoritative, dealing out rewards and punishments as he determines. Saul is determined to reach the goals he established. Saul is the face of his organization and he does not share his glory with those who serve him. Saul is the epitome of when in charge be in charge. Saul is the leader modeled after the world. He is what a leader of the world receives instruction to become.

Know

The first thing a leader must know is who they are to be, in the eyes of those they lead. Israel stated to Samuel that they wanted a leader just like all the other nations, so God granted them their wish, Saul. Accordingly, Saul looked to other nations and became a great king. From these kingdoms, Saul knew what he should appear to be as king. Saul knew that kings must have the blessings of deity, so he sacrificed and sat among the prophets. Saul knew that potential rising stars in government were a threat to his kingdom. Saul knew that God, due to his overly decisive nature, had determined that another king would arise to take his place. Saul knew that such a threat needs elimination. Saul knew that great kings do not live in the shadows of a servant, even a general of their army. Saul knew that David held God's blessing and that he might be the one prophesied to replace the king. Through knowledge comes action.

Do

Saul was a good leader as the world defines good leaders. His actions accepted as the prerogatives of any king. He held powerful generals who won victories over mighty armies, to include the destruction of Goliath, the Philistine warrior of Gath. Saul had earned the right to take the sons and daughters if Israel as servants. Saul had earned the right to take portions of the fields as tax, and to conscript men into military service. These were the actions of mighty kings. Saul had the right to persecute a general who seemed to be stealing the people away from the king, no matter how loyal the servant remained. Saul was a mighty warrior, so no javelin thrown was to destroy but put the young upstart David in his place. Saul, the mighty warrior king, had the right to be moody and have whomever he wanted, play the harp for him, even a general, like the upstart David. When near the end of his reign it was fitting that Saul, pursue the fleeing traitorous general.

Scriptural Leadership

Saul was a leader of the world but not a godly leader. As Gene Edward begins the story with the possibilities of two destinies, it is easy to see that Saul is the destiny of exterior power. While many of his leadership qualities are admirable qualities of decisiveness, authoritativeness, determination, protectiveness, and knowledge, they remain exterior qualities. This is the point that Edwards determines to make by presenting Saul bearing the exterior power of God and not accepting the power that transform the interior and build the character required to lead the people of God. The interior power denied by Saul is the very power that transformed the shepherd David into the mighty king of Israel.

David

David is the one figure who transcends both parts of the tale. David is the youngest son of Jessie, who tends his father sheep. David is the young one called from the field to appear before the prophet Samuel for anointing as the next king of Israel. David will reveal the interior power of God and the effect it can have on a leader.


 

Be

David through suffering realizes that as king he is to be a servant to God, and to serve the people of Israel. David understands the humility of the servant from a life of servitude as a shepherd, a musician in the royal courts, and as a military leader under the authority of a crazed king. David demonstrates differing aspects of leadership from Saul. David demonstrates self-control, compassion, loyalty, repentance, and a desire for God. Therefore, David teaches Christian that a leader is to be a controlled person, who is compassionate with their followers, loyal to all, able to admit mistakes, and one who seeks after God.

Know

David learned the aspects of leadership through an intimate relationship with God born through struggles. David learned early as a shepherd the need for communicating with God by forced loneliness on the hillsides of Bethlehem, keep watch over the sheep. David learned the power of God's deliverance through the killing of predators intent on killing the sheep. David learned the compassion to lead people in the tender manners of God, by leading and caring for the sheep of his father. David learned to wait on God to deliver on those hillsides. David the loyalty needed to perform the duties assigned while serving his father. David recorded these lessons in the Psalms. David knew that God was a God worthy of worship and One Who performed righteously among men. David knew he was to emulate God before humanity.

Do

Therefore, David performed the tasks assigned by King Saul wisely. David played for the crazed king when asked, ducked thrown javelins, and remained loyal even while being pursued for execution. David never refused to play, heaved a well-aimed javelin in return, or took the life of the king, even when presented with opportunity. David knew the Lord, David behaved accordingly. David knew God's power to deliver so David prayed for deliverance, and waited on God to deliver. David demonstrates humility, performing according to his knowledge of God. David remained loyal to the king's son, loyal to his men, loyal to the king, but more importantly loyal to the plan of God for his life. David does what godly leaders do; they seek God's will.

Scriptural Leadership

David's portrayal as the suffering servant who God transforms by the roles he plays in life. David, as Edwards reveals, handles these situations because he trusts in God, not because he is weak. David as a warrior, the slayer of Goliath, could have returned a killing javelin to Saul numerous times. David's restraint is born from the learned trust of God. David's compassion, humility, and temperance, as painted by Edwards, are traits that godly leaders possess. David had no need for vengeance because to God alone does vengeance belong. Even in the latter years of his reign, when Absalom revolts against his father, David remains calm and quietly leaves the palace trusting God to restore him or take him home. Spiritual leaders who follow David have a quite strength born from an intimate relationship with God.

Absalom

Absalom, the eldest son of David, the one everyone expects to be king is a good-looking man endued with wisdom. He however utilizes his strengths in rebellion against God's plan for Israel.

Be

Absalom, as presented, demonstrates a few expectations people hold for leaders. Saul taught the reader leaders are to be strong, determined, powerful people. David added to these qualities the aspects of following God, brave, humble, compassionate, and loyal. Absalom demonstrates that leaders need be charismatic and wise in their ability to handle the troubles of the people. Absalom learned well the need for wisdom growing in the home of the king.

Know

Absalom learned early that people respect power, looks, and wisdom. He knew that he was born with two of those aspects. He knew the power he naturally held as the eldest son of the king. He knew the way people looked at him, and how he reminded them of his father, the king. Absalom knew that wisdom came from putting knowledge to practice. Absalom knew that righteousness and fairness belonged to everyone, even the king. Absalom knew of his father's mistake and saw God's forgiveness. Absalom felt he knew that his father mishandled his punishment for avenging the wrong of sister by a half brother. Absalom knew how to get back at his father.

Do

The presentation of Absalom is one of knowledge lifting a person up in pride. It is the picture of one under authority perceiving injustice and rising against that injustice. Absalom did rebel without a plan; it was not the mindless actions of rage. As Edwards reminds, Absalom used his natural gifts of influence as the king's son, his looks, and acquired wisdom from watching his father hold court to win the people from David. Absalom did that which is the right of any upcoming star in leadership; he took from someone who he felt was no longer capable of leading properly. In many ways, he performed one of the first hostile takeovers in history.

Scriptural Leadership

Absalom once again demonstrates traits admired by the world and Christians. He is young, vibrant, charismatic, wise, and influential. However, he represents the exterior power with no interior development. Absalom does not see the mercy his father gave to him by not requiring his life or that he live in a city of refuge. Instead, Absalom embodies the idea that those who want recognition in life must claim that power for themselves, no matter who is hurt. Absalom did sell out his own father. Christian leaders may be charismatic, the need be wise, and they must have influence, but they must allow God to grant their recognition or they will impose their will against God's will.

Personal Reflection

As an educator and leader, the need for dynamic leadership is paramount. One can chose to develop this through exterior skill developments or one can allow God to transform the inner person. As for this educator, both paths have been followed, and the temptation to return javelins as not always been resisted. The amount of suffering required to kill pride can lead to the near insurmountable desire to rebel against God's plan, exercise some aspect of admirable leadership in a worldly manner and grasp early that which one is not ready to possess. For a man of action the waiting on God's timing is the most stressful event on earth. However, through this tale understanding arises that this time of learning humility afford the leader the strength and patience to bear the trials to come.

References

Edwards, G. (1980), A tale of three kings: a study in brokenness, Tyndale House Publishers, Wheaton, Illinois